Skip to main content

Equality is not all black and white


It was pretty common in the late 1970's and early 1980's for black players in the English leagues to be jeered and to cop monkey calls. The first really big name black players like Viv Anderson, Laurie Cunningham and Luther Blisset took it all and acheived success despite the absence of any legislation or affirmative action type system to give them any favours.

Here at the Kick Project, we obviously place great importance on racial equality in football and I greatly admire these players for overcoming the odds purely on the strength of character and talent. They all did a great service not just for football but for society in general.

Yet, discrimination still exists and it manifests in many forms throughout society in England, and elsewhere.

Gordon Taylor, boss of the English Professional Footballers' Association has called for a program to encourage black managers in the EPL.

While its true that there is a shortage of black managers at the top levels, I'm not sure affirmative action is the way to go.

For one, racial discrimination is a broad social issue in Britain, not just a football issue. As such, it is unlikely to be solved by tinkering with football management.

Secondly, my experience is that positive social change happens most often and most effectively when it is through education and attitude, not laws, rules or policy. When those first black players came through in the late 1970's, there was no decree that encouraged it; it was simply the result of an increasingly immigrant society - mainly from the Caribbean - leading to second generation homegrown black footballers. They were good enough, and the English football infrastructure was smart enough to know it and to bring them on.

Thirdly, black players I have known would rather be successful as footballers, not as black footballers. As such, they dont want to be seen to be on the receiving end of any kind of leg-up, even a slight one.

A final issue is why make an issue of black managers only? Why not more women? Or more Jews? Or more Pakistanis? Or more left-footers?

I'm all for forms of righting wrongs through positive discrimination when it is clear that vilification is embedded in the institutions of the state - as they were in South Africa. That is not the case in today's Britain. Whatever racial inequality that exists is the symptom of a wider and deeper social and cultural  issue.

Football, while an important cultural and social influence will not address the problem by pushing more black managers into the professional ranks. The problem is bigger than that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post-UNOSDP - Is the IOC fool's gold?

This is a longer version of an article published on SportandDev.org
With the United Nations Office on Sport for Development and Peace closed down by the global body, there is undoubtedly a void in this space in which many of us here work.
But, for all the high profile oomph the UNOSDP added to the world of sport for good, it’s passing need not be seen as devastating.
For one, the work the UNOSDP has already done in its 16 years of life has laid a platform for the development of sport for social justice. While many of us knew for years that sport had a wider purpose beyond mere business or entertainment, the UNOSDP has provided a base of credibility that may have otherwise taken much longer to establish.
While much of the work is, in many ways, still to be done, the UNOSDP has left a positive legacy on which we can all build.
More problematic is the shifting of the UNOSDP’s brief to the IOC.
Obliging the IOC to administer to the peace and development facets of modern sport raises three qu…

Playing for Positives: How Pro Sport and Good Causes Can Work Together

Interesting read from The New Yorker on the authority and power invested in professional athletes, in relation to influencing the progress of social justice.

The focus here is on American sports, but the theme can be easily extended to other sports, worldwide.

It's perhaps no surprise perhaps that the rise of pro sports as a massive industry in its own right, with the parallel gains for individuals in money and celebrity terms, that more athletes don't speak out about important issues. There's clearly a lot at stake, and a lot to lose for those who step off the tightly managed corporate line running through most large sports organisations and clubs.

But, the fact that a large percentage of today's professional athletes come from simple backgrounds, if not from situations of outright poverty and/or abuse, begs the question of why don't more speak up about the circumstances that they escaped from and in which some of their peers in youth remain ensconced?

The Kick P…

The Football Ambassadors of Pre-Partition Bangladesh

Bangladesh had a fraught path to independence. Squeezed in between the mega forces of Pakistan and India the people of the former East Pakistan suffered greatly as they sought freedom.

But, as this little known story (at least to us) shows, there was an important strategy by some to use sport to open up the debate.

Some of the tactics used might sit uncomfortably with some - the involvement of some Indians for instance seems reflective of the politics of convenience at a tense time for instance - but the overall strategy of using sport as a form of peace diplomacy is roundly endorsed by The Kick Project.

The power of sport to open up the space for dialogue - often in inarticulate ways - remains a powerful and too-little used force for good in the human world.

This interesting read from Vice.