Skip to main content

Some Numbers

Pic from Syria from

The UN has released some figures on its peace-keeping efforts worldwide. While the organisation does what it can, it is clear that it - the pre-eminent peace-keeping organisation in the world - is far from making even a scratch on the surface of global conflict. 

These figures confirm our reasons for being.

There are 16 current conflicts the UN is working in around the world. The oldest is on the India-Pakistan border (in place since 1949), the newest in the central African republic (2014). Since 1948, there have been 71 UN peace-keeping operations and so, today, just under 23% of all the peace-keeping operations voted as necessary by the UN in 67 years are on-going.

The UN says there are 125,396 peace-keepers in the UN's employ (so-called Blue Helmets).

The budget for peace-keeping in 2014/15 is $US8.5 billion.

It sounds a lot, but consider the following.

The total armed personnel in just the top 20 militarised countries in the world is 1.3 billion. That's one peace-keeper for every 10,367 war-makers.

There is just $1 spent by the UN on peace-keeping for every $US 212 spent on arms around the world.

There are 32 recognised conflicts around the world today - and this is not including various trouble zones like West Timor for instance - which means around half of them are outside the UN's peace-keepers.

The victims of these wars are growing and the numbers of internally displaced persons (IDPs)  - refugees in their own countries - is the highest it has been since World War II.

Today there are some 38 million IDPs in the world.

There are 230 million children in war zones.

As such, it is clear that states and state based bodies cannot keep up. It is up to us, the civilian sector, to fill the gap. We can do this by not engaging in or supporting war, of course, But we can also look to support children in conflict situations, to do what we can to give the next generation a chance at peace.

In Gaza, our first program, there are 400,000 children in immediate need of psychological care, largely as a result of recent conflicts there.

This is clearly untenable. If these numbers continue their trend, which is upwards, the UN for one will be less able to cope.

It looks increasingly like it is up to us.


Popular posts from this blog

Post-UNOSDP - Is the IOC fool's gold?

This is a longer version of an article published on
With the United Nations Office on Sport for Development and Peace closed down by the global body, there is undoubtedly a void in this space in which many of us here work.
But, for all the high profile oomph the UNOSDP added to the world of sport for good, it’s passing need not be seen as devastating.
For one, the work the UNOSDP has already done in its 16 years of life has laid a platform for the development of sport for social justice. While many of us knew for years that sport had a wider purpose beyond mere business or entertainment, the UNOSDP has provided a base of credibility that may have otherwise taken much longer to establish.
While much of the work is, in many ways, still to be done, the UNOSDP has left a positive legacy on which we can all build.
More problematic is the shifting of the UNOSDP’s brief to the IOC.
Obliging the IOC to administer to the peace and development facets of modern sport raises three qu…

Playing for Positives: How Pro Sport and Good Causes Can Work Together

Interesting read from The New Yorker on the authority and power invested in professional athletes, in relation to influencing the progress of social justice.

The focus here is on American sports, but the theme can be easily extended to other sports, worldwide.

It's perhaps no surprise perhaps that the rise of pro sports as a massive industry in its own right, with the parallel gains for individuals in money and celebrity terms, that more athletes don't speak out about important issues. There's clearly a lot at stake, and a lot to lose for those who step off the tightly managed corporate line running through most large sports organisations and clubs.

But, the fact that a large percentage of today's professional athletes come from simple backgrounds, if not from situations of outright poverty and/or abuse, begs the question of why don't more speak up about the circumstances that they escaped from and in which some of their peers in youth remain ensconced?

The Kick P…

The Football Ambassadors of Pre-Partition Bangladesh

Bangladesh had a fraught path to independence. Squeezed in between the mega forces of Pakistan and India the people of the former East Pakistan suffered greatly as they sought freedom.

But, as this little known story (at least to us) shows, there was an important strategy by some to use sport to open up the debate.

Some of the tactics used might sit uncomfortably with some - the involvement of some Indians for instance seems reflective of the politics of convenience at a tense time for instance - but the overall strategy of using sport as a form of peace diplomacy is roundly endorsed by The Kick Project.

The power of sport to open up the space for dialogue - often in inarticulate ways - remains a powerful and too-little used force for good in the human world.

This interesting read from Vice.