Skip to main content

So, what do we think about Gianni Infantino?

We watched the FIFA Extraordinary Congress on Friday night our time. We saw the speeches. We watched the votes being cast in those odd little tents. We watched the glad handing. We sensed the deals. As Australians we had our own small role, as our own David Gallop from the FFA acted as a scrutineer, shuffling bits of green ballot paper like playing cards.

We were surprised by the results (only 4 votes for Prince Ali bin Al Hussein?..None for Champagne?.....). But, did we like what we saw, what we heard? Simple answer: Yes and No. Not really so simple.

First, the positives. The fact that FIFA has been forced to look into itself and to accept the verdict of the people on the disastrous impact of the Havelange-Blatter era has to be good. The solid vote in favour of the reform process is a favourable result.

The very reason for the meeting is the resignation of Sepp Blatter after he was elected with the usual insult to democratic process. His step down is a victory for the game.

The palpable tension in the room, the sense that no-one really knew the result was a real win for democracy at football central. Let's hope such a competitive vote will become the norm.

Also, most of the speeches carried varying degrees of contrition. All seemed aware that FIFA had done wrong and had to atone. All seemed prepared to put in the hard yards getting things right.

Finally, in Mr. Infantino as President, we may have the least worst outcome. The other candidates seemed further from a solution than the former UEFA boss and so, it seems, he may be the best of a not so great bunch.

But, for all the positives, the negatives may outweigh them all yet.

Firstly, those speeches. We offer two-word assessments of each below and it is fair to say that all missed the mark. None sought to step outside the box, to envisage a wholly new FIFA. All were prepared to argue for the protection of the organisation, as if the institution was somehow bigger than the game itself. A few sought to look ahead through the lens of the past, unwilling to cut away from the Blatter years and unable to unshackle themselves from FIFA's murky culture.

Secondly, in connection with above, all the candidates came from the system that spawned the Blatter outrages. All have fed at FIFA's teat without much of a concern for the consequences and with their own careers and self-aggrandisement at the forefront of their work.

The reform process looks good on paper. But that's largely because FIFA has set such a low bar on such matters that we are happy with even a cursory effort. As we have argued, this process still needs a lot of work to make it truly significant and influential in terms of FIFA's troubled context.

Mr Infantino has runs on the board at UEFA. Yet, this Swiss career sports administrator is very much a man of the Blatter system. As a protege of Michel Platini, we can assume that, to some extent, Infantino will closely link to the French master player's own presidential goals and aims, which were curtailed as he himself fell to corruption claims and was banned from running.

And, his pitch was to greed. He sought support from Confederation bosses and country member associations, promising more money and FIFA support. That sounds on the surface to be a good thing. But, given FIFA's graft riddled system that looks to mean more fund peddling, more white elephants, more self-interested spending and more politics.

Moreover, the President himself will have less power under the new governance structure, so his ability to knock heads together and to get some proper shape in the organisation is lessened. This actually makes it more difficult for an incoming president to really change that much anyway, assuming he wanted to. The devolution to country and regional heads is not necessarily a good thing.

The reform process and a new, more heavily scrutinised President - albeit a less powerful one - will struggle to break apart a system that ignores grassroots issues and has failed dismally in areas like gender equality and anti-corruption.

Like many, we will be contacting Mr Infantino and will be congratulating him on his election. We will be asking for him to listen more to groups like us and to those for whom we work, our stakeholders. Whether he does or not will be one of his true tests.

Time will tell.

The Speeches - Our Ratings
Prince Ali bin Al Hussein: Nervous, Stilted
Salman bin Ibrahim Al Khalifa: Arrogant, Out of Touch
Jerome Champagne: Passionate, Old Guard
Gianni Infantino: Genial, Dependable
Tokyo Sexwale: Comic Relief, Resigned to Defeat


Popular posts from this blog

Post-UNOSDP - Is the IOC fool's gold?

This is a longer version of an article published on
With the United Nations Office on Sport for Development and Peace closed down by the global body, there is undoubtedly a void in this space in which many of us here work.
But, for all the high profile oomph the UNOSDP added to the world of sport for good, it’s passing need not be seen as devastating.
For one, the work the UNOSDP has already done in its 16 years of life has laid a platform for the development of sport for social justice. While many of us knew for years that sport had a wider purpose beyond mere business or entertainment, the UNOSDP has provided a base of credibility that may have otherwise taken much longer to establish.
While much of the work is, in many ways, still to be done, the UNOSDP has left a positive legacy on which we can all build.
More problematic is the shifting of the UNOSDP’s brief to the IOC.
Obliging the IOC to administer to the peace and development facets of modern sport raises three qu…

Statement on Funding for the Rohingya Football Club

We are very pleased to announce that The Kick Project has received a $AUD16,500 donation from the Australian Government to fund a pilot soccer program with Rohingya refugees in Malaysia. The funds, coming through the Australian High Commission in Malaysia, will allow the charity to support the Rohingya Football Club which has become a vital part of the exiled Rohingya community in Kuala Lumpur. The program entails kitting out the team, providing transport to games and establishing a sports and community hub where Rohingya people can access sporting equipment and coaching. Young people, and girls in particular, are the long term focus of the initiative. The Kick Project founder James Rose says the Rohingya are in dire need of assistance. "The UN has called the Rohingya arguably the most persecuted group in the world. They've been forced to flee their homelands in Myanmar, where they have been made stateless by government decree, and many have lost their lives as a result." As r…

Playing for Positives: How Pro Sport and Good Causes Can Work Together

Interesting read from The New Yorker on the authority and power invested in professional athletes, in relation to influencing the progress of social justice.

The focus here is on American sports, but the theme can be easily extended to other sports, worldwide.

It's perhaps no surprise perhaps that the rise of pro sports as a massive industry in its own right, with the parallel gains for individuals in money and celebrity terms, that more athletes don't speak out about important issues. There's clearly a lot at stake, and a lot to lose for those who step off the tightly managed corporate line running through most large sports organisations and clubs.

But, the fact that a large percentage of today's professional athletes come from simple backgrounds, if not from situations of outright poverty and/or abuse, begs the question of why don't more speak up about the circumstances that they escaped from and in which some of their peers in youth remain ensconced?

The Kick P…