Skip to main content

FIFA rewrite needed, but who holds the pen?

With so much ado about FIFA's risible descent into farce, there's a lot of accusations and blame being thrown around.

While it's fair to say FIFA and its head-honchos have stuffed up big time, many are also casting a jaundiced eye over those who have dipped into the FIFA trough and who would likely benefit from the status quo. Among them are the 180 or so national football associations who failed to join the English FA and others standing for ethics and call for a cessation of the entire voting process - including for the latest World Cup votes - pending a complete review of the corruption allegations (although the FA, to be fair, has a vested interest in having a recount on the World Cup bid as it may have a chance of winning it this time).

Among them, I'm sorry to say, is the Australian FFA, rightly lambasted by former player and now commentator Craig Fozzie Foster in the local Australian press (and on his TV spots) on the weekend for falling into line and disgracefully backing Blatter's nomination.

But, while playing the blame game is warranted and makes us all feel a little better about the shameful state of the world game's administration, there has to be a light at the end of the tunnel. Simply calling for recounts or mass sackings (no matter how justified) have to be bolstered by a roadmap for a post- Blatter, post-corruption future.

To this end, the Change FIFA organisation appear to be onto something. Note the word "appear" as here too, no concrete direction is set out. Calling for an politician-led revolution, as Change FIFA seems to be doing, looks destined to replace one bureaucratic coterie with another.

Yet, the organisation's website invokes the Barcelona model - whereby membership is open to all, is relatively cheap and where all members have a vote in important matters at the club - it's backers seemingly disagree with calling for a full democratisation of FIFA along similar lines.

So, why not open FIFA up to all of the world game's billions strong family? Why not break the paternalistic and parochial culture of the body and generate an interest in the globalising and border-fading potential of the game? Why not depoliticise FIFA by pushing for an alternative body which features cheap or non-existant membership fees - perhaps through local clubs not regional associations - and which gives one vote to each individual?

Of course its a crazy idea and probably unworkable, but why not look deeper into it to see what can be done in this direction? At least this might be considered as a basis to elect a new executive body to run the world game.

If we can't try something like this now - with all the communication technology we can now lay our hands on - then when? Surely its better than simply replacing one leadership elite with another, and better than doing nothing other than dither and complain?


Popular posts from this blog

Post-UNOSDP - Is the IOC fool's gold?

This is a longer version of an article published on
With the United Nations Office on Sport for Development and Peace closed down by the global body, there is undoubtedly a void in this space in which many of us here work.
But, for all the high profile oomph the UNOSDP added to the world of sport for good, it’s passing need not be seen as devastating.
For one, the work the UNOSDP has already done in its 16 years of life has laid a platform for the development of sport for social justice. While many of us knew for years that sport had a wider purpose beyond mere business or entertainment, the UNOSDP has provided a base of credibility that may have otherwise taken much longer to establish.
While much of the work is, in many ways, still to be done, the UNOSDP has left a positive legacy on which we can all build.
More problematic is the shifting of the UNOSDP’s brief to the IOC.
Obliging the IOC to administer to the peace and development facets of modern sport raises three qu…

Statement on Funding for the Rohingya Football Club

We are very pleased to announce that The Kick Project has received a $AUD16,500 donation from the Australian Government to fund a pilot soccer program with Rohingya refugees in Malaysia. The funds, coming through the Australian High Commission in Malaysia, will allow the charity to support the Rohingya Football Club which has become a vital part of the exiled Rohingya community in Kuala Lumpur. The program entails kitting out the team, providing transport to games and establishing a sports and community hub where Rohingya people can access sporting equipment and coaching. Young people, and girls in particular, are the long term focus of the initiative. The Kick Project founder James Rose says the Rohingya are in dire need of assistance. "The UN has called the Rohingya arguably the most persecuted group in the world. They've been forced to flee their homelands in Myanmar, where they have been made stateless by government decree, and many have lost their lives as a result." As r…

Playing for Positives: How Pro Sport and Good Causes Can Work Together

Interesting read from The New Yorker on the authority and power invested in professional athletes, in relation to influencing the progress of social justice.

The focus here is on American sports, but the theme can be easily extended to other sports, worldwide.

It's perhaps no surprise perhaps that the rise of pro sports as a massive industry in its own right, with the parallel gains for individuals in money and celebrity terms, that more athletes don't speak out about important issues. There's clearly a lot at stake, and a lot to lose for those who step off the tightly managed corporate line running through most large sports organisations and clubs.

But, the fact that a large percentage of today's professional athletes come from simple backgrounds, if not from situations of outright poverty and/or abuse, begs the question of why don't more speak up about the circumstances that they escaped from and in which some of their peers in youth remain ensconced?

The Kick P…